Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 40
New Muslim Party v. State of Tennessee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff: New Muslim Party
Defendant: State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hiroto v. Smith
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff: Takayujki Hiroto
Defendant: Lashunda Smith
Counter Defendant: Open House Texas Realty and Investments, Open House Property Management, The City of Plano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
In re: Georgia Senate Bill 202
as 23-13085
Plaintiff / Appellee: THE NEW GEORGIA PROJECT, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, RISE, INC. and others
Intervenor: REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE, NATIONAL REPUBLICAN CONGRESSIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GEORGIA SECRETARY OF STATE, MATTHEW MASHBURN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR DOUGHERTY COUNTY and others
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, JOHNNY VARNER, JACK NOA and others
Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., et al v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
as 23-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee: STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Defendant: BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party: REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, SARAH COLE, NEW ENGLAND FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07850
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jaskirat Singh, et al v. David Berger, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-5234
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sukhbir Singh Toor
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jaskirat Singh, Aekash Singh and Milaap Singh Chahal
Defendant / Appellee: David H. Berger, in his official capacity as the Commandant of the Marine Corps, Lloyd J. Austin, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Defense, United States Department of Defense and others
Amicus Curiae: Sikh American Veterans Alliance, Women Veterans and Families Network, Anti-Defamation League and others
Shirley Remmert, et al v. Hisham Al-Zaghari, et al
as 22-15589
Plaintiff / Appellant: SHIRLEY VENOYA REMMERT
Plaintiff: EVA D. AL-ZAGHARI
Defendant / Appellee: HISHAM AL-ZAGHARI, HANI AL-ZAGHARI, MAHMOUD AL-ZAGHARI and others
IN RE GEORGIA SENATE BILL 202
as 1:2021mi55555
Plaintiff: The New Georgia Project, Black Voters Matter Fund, Rise, Inc. and others
Defendant: Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan, David Worley and others
Intervenor Defendant: National Republican Congressional Committee and Republican National Committee
Amicus Curiae: Amicus Curiae, American Center for Law and Justice, Foundation for Government Accountability and others
Petitioner: District of Columbia, Public Interest Legal Foundation, Senator Max Burns and others
Not Classified By Court: Clerk of the Superio Debra DeBerry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church et al v. Kemp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01284
Defendant: Wandy Taylor, Tim McFalls, Rocky Raffle and others
Plaintiff: Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, Women Watch Afrika and others
Intervenor Defendant: Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Lebovits et al v. Cuomo et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01284
Plaintiff: Chana Shapiro-Lebovits, Yitzchok Lebovits and Bais Yaakov Ateres Miriam
Defendant: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, City of New York, Howard A. Zucker and others
Amicus Curiae: Claremont Center for Constitutionial Jurisprudence, Asma Uddin, The Muslim Public Affairs Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?