Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
COOPER v. SANYANG et al
as 1:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
DARRELL BERNARD COOPER
Defendant:
LAWANDA SANYANG, LADONNA PRICE, ROBIN WALTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Thrasher et al
as 2:2023cv00723
Plaintiff:
Maggie Adams
Defendant:
Officer Thrasher and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Wal-Mart Inc
as 8:2023cv04831
Plaintiff:
Maggie Smith
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Inc doing business as Store #0396
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
WOODS v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
FELTON WOODS
Defendant:
FANTASIA EDMONDS, ATTORNEY JANE DOE, Ms. STEPHANIE REAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Maggie's Auto Sales and Services, LLC v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03773
Plaintiff:
Maggie's Auto Sales and Services, LLC doing business as Everyone Drivez Auto Sales
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Maggi v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
John Maggi
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Adams v. Thrasher et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Maggie Adams
Defendant:
Officer Thrasher and John/Jane Doe(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Maggie Boler
as 23-4352
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MAGGIE ANNE BOLER
Grant v. PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC et al
as 9:2022cv04262
Plaintiff:
Terry Lennette Grant
Defendant:
PETER WOLF & ASSOCIATES PC, Peter Wolf, Esq, WOLF & MOGIL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
