Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Anuj Mahendra Patel v. Bryan Burkholz
as 2:2023cv06291
Petitioner:
Anuj Bryan Patel and Anuj Mahendra Patel
Respondent:
Warden Bryan Burkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Access Point Financial, LLC v. Patel et al
as 1:2021cv03784
Plaintiff:
Access Point Financial, LLC
Defendant:
Bharathbhai Patel, Reema Patel, Charles Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AXA INSURANCE COMPANY v. BNSF LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv01210
Defendant:
ASR TRUCKING LLC, BNSF LOGISTICS, LLC and MAHENDRA PATEL
Plaintiff:
AXA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AXA INSURANCE COMPANY v. BNSF LOGISTICS, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv01210
Defendant:
ASR TRUCKING LLC, BNSF LOGISTICS, LLC and MAHENDRA PATEL
Plaintiff:
AXA INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc. v. Angel Hospitality, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv06046
Plaintiff:
Red Lion Hotels Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Angel Hospitality, LLC, Mahendra Patel and Mike Patel
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
RAVAL et al v. BHAGYA, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00184
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH BOLES and ANUP RAVAL
Defendant:
MAHENDRA PATEL and BHAGYA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
PATEL v. AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD
as 2:2017cv02281
Plaintiff:
MAHENDRA PATEL
Defendant:
AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Patel et al
as 2:2016cv00893
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Mahendra Patel and Kala Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Johnson v. Patel et al
as 2:2016at00500
Plaintiff:
Scott Johnson
Defendant:
Mahendra Patel, Kala Patel and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. PRAMUKH HOSPITALITY, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00319
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
PRAMUKH HOSPITALITY, LLC, MAHENDRA PATEL and ATUL PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
