Cases 1 - 10 of 266
Gogri v. Gogri et al
as 3:2024cv03067
Plaintiff:
Mahesh Gogri
Defendant:
Karan Gogri, Shilpa Gogri, Rene Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PATEL, M.D. v. OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv06133
Plaintiff:
AARTI PATEL, M.D.
Defendant:
OPTUM MEDICAL CARE OF NEW JERSEY, P.C. and MAHESH TEKRIWAL, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Khurana et al v. Cenlar FSB
as 3:2024cv01740
Plaintiff:
Anita Khurana and Mahesh Khurana
Defendant:
Cenlar FSB
Khurana et al v. Clear Recon Corp et al
as 4:2024cv01741
Plaintiff:
Anita Khurana and Mahesh Khurana
Defendant:
Clear Recon Corp and Cenlar FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
James Ternaprovich, et al v. Louis Shicker, et al
as 24-1197
Plaintiff:
JASON A. HODGE, MANUEL MALAVE, JAMES TERNAPROVICH and others
Appellant:
JEFFREY ORR, et al.
Defendant:
LOUIS SHICKER, Doctor, STEVE MEEKS, STEVEN BOWMAN and others
Gogri v. Gogri et al
as 3:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Mahesh Gogri
Defendant:
karan gogri, Shilpa Gogri, renee grady and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Kenneth S. Grossman v. David Sin et al
as 2:2023cv09501
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S. Grossman
Defendant:
David Sin, Angelo John Coloma, Andrew Rickman and others
Warren v. Aditya et al
as 3:2023cv00719
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Warren
Defendant:
Mahesh Aditya, Santander Consumer Holdings, Bruce Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Gaddam v. Castill-Ortega et al
as 4:2023cv00939
Plaintiff:
Mahesh Gaddam
Defendant:
Odilon Castill-Ortega and Adahl Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Moore v. Capri Holdings Limited et al
as 1:2023cv08718
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
Capri Holdings Limited, John D. Idol, Marilyn Crouther and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
