Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Malark Enterprises, Inc. v. Malark et al
as 0:2022cv02789
Plaintiff:
Malark Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Douglas J. Malark, Malark Companies, LLC and Malark Companies LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Fabricio v. Lee
as 21-2964
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ederick Fabricio
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. Miller, C.O. J. Erns, C.O. Chase and others
Defendant:
Supt. W. Lee, Supt. T. Griffin, Dep. SS. E. Burnett and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. "Bill" et al
as 1:2020cv01787
Defendant:
Nurse Dave Lindemann, Correction Officer Finn, Correction Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Gunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Annucci et al
as 9:2019cv00109
Defendant:
William Hoffnagle, Kevin P. Bruen, Brian Gary and others
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2018cv03179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
AROSA SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC. v. RECOM SOLAR, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01340
Plaintiff:
AROSA SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
RECOM SOLAR, LLC, RECOM AG, HAMLET TUNYAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harnett v. Benford et al
as 1:2017cv03522
Plaintiff:
Timothy Harnett
Defendant:
Lee Benford, Cuniff, Malark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urena v. The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision et al
as 1:2016cv09708
Plaintiff:
Christian Urena
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Anthony Annucci, R. Coccuza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabricio v. Lee et al
as 1:2016cv08731
Plaintiff:
Ederick Fabricio
Defendant:
W. Lee, T. Griffin, E. Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
