Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Melwani et al v. Government Of Guam et al
as 1:2026cv00027
Plaintiff:
Manu Melwani and Anita Melwani
Defendant:
Government Of Guam, Department of Revenue and Taxation and Director Marie Lizama
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
In re Naturalization Ceremony 09/01/26
as 3:2026mc80271
Unknown:
In Re Naturalization Ceremony, Abraham Jehu Aguilar Valenzuela, Dulce Abrera Alcantara and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02635
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Slavick v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2026cv00361
Plaintiff:
Chris Slavick
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Department of Public Safety, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Interested Party:
State of Hawaii Litigation Coordinator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ranere v. Bannock County, Idaho et al.
as 4:2026cv00383
Plaintiff:
Trevor Ranere
Defendant:
Bannock County, Idaho, Sheriff Tony Manu, Captain Jeremy Taysom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamas v. Linkedin Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv05301
Plaintiff:
Erich Lamas
Defendant:
Linkedin Corporation, Subbish Kumar, Seth Goh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Davidoff et al v. Prerna et al
as 1:2026cv02903
Plaintiff:
Boris Davidoff and Anna Vishev
Defendant:
ABROL PRERNA, ANIL KANT, DIMITRI PESCIANSCHI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
MANUS MEDICAL, LLC v. USA
as 1:2026cv00538
Plaintiff:
MANUS MEDICAL, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
