Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Brown v. Attorney General for the State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv00250
Petitioner:
Marc Christopher Brown, Jr.
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of Maryland, Warden and Department of Public Safety & Correctional Serives
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02315
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Jones v. USA
as 1:2016cv00096
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marc Christopher Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Rivera et al
as 3:2011cv04741
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jason George Rivera, Jr., Marc Christopher Harmon, The Joseph Rene Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Turner v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2011ct03177
Plaintiff:
Marc Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracy Johns, Karen Steinour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Marc Turner
as 11-10038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARC CHRISTOPHER TURNER
Bergh, Lorraine et al v. County Of Eau Claire et al
as 3:2010cv00407
Plaintiff:
Lorraine Bergh and Gary Bergh
Defendant:
County Of Eau Claire, Ron Cramer, Jeff Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Johns
as 5:2010hc02075
Petitioner:
Marc Christopher Turner
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plunk v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2009cv00295
Petitioner:
Marc Christopher Plunk
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
French et al v. Mattheyer et al
as 5:2009cv00015
Plaintiff:
Marc Christopher French and Rachel VanHorn
Defendant:
Matthew Mattheyer and Chandler City of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
