Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Davis et al v. Berrien, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Melvin Davis, Sr., Charase Dorsey, Anisha Bird and others
Defendant:
Berrien, County of, Steve Pierangeli, Mark Sanford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
LOGAN v. GARLAND et al
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
MERRITT GARLAND, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, WILLIAM J. BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Shackleford v. US Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 3:2023cv01570
Plaintiff:
Dave D. Shackleford
Defendant:
US Department of Housing and Urban Development, Marcia L. Fudge, City of Stamford and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv40159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
JOHNSON v. VON ROSENTIEL et al
as 2:2023cv04179
Plaintiff:
TARANI-ALIKE JOHNSON and TARANI A JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARTHA VON ROSENTIEL, MARTHA E VON ROSENTIEL, SHELLEY ROBIN-NEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ak v. Fudge
as 8:2023cv02791
Plaintiff:
Mustafa Ak
Defendant:
Marcia L. Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 d Federally Assisted Programs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02240
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
