Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ford et al v. Enterprise Leasing Company Southeast LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00186
Plaintiff:
Robert Ford and Margaret Ford
Defendant:
Enterprise Leasing Company Southeast LLC , FCA US LLC/Chrysler/Fiat Chrysler and Coastal States Automotive Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adner et al v. International Paper Co
as 3:2013cv00368
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Adner , Mable Alford , Ruthie Allen and others
Defendant:
International Paper Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Forde et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00353
Plaintiff:
Margaret Forde and Arthur Forde
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forde et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 1:2011cv01442
Plaintiff:
Margaret Forde and Arthur Forde
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cas Tanner v. Peggy Smith, et al
as 10-20368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CAS S. TANNER
Defendant - Appellee:
PEGGY SMITH, RUDY SOLIZ, KENNETH HERNANDEZ and others
Ford v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2009cv10226
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ford
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare, LLC, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tanner v. Smith et al Do not docket in (4:08mc580). Documents should be filed in (4:09cv3941)
as 4:2009cv03941
Plaintiff:
Cas Tanner
Defendant:
Peggy Smith, Rudy Soliz, Kenneth Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tanner v. Houston Community College System et al. DO NOT DOCKET IN MISC 09-580. ENTRIES SHOULD BE MADE IN THE RELATED CIVIL CASE.
as 4:2009mc00580
Plaintiff:
Cas Tanner
Defendant:
Houston Community College System, Peggy Smith, Rudy Soliz and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv02740
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
