Cases 1 - 10 of 123
Gomez-Palchazaca v. Garland
as 24-497
Petitioner:
MARIA GOMEZ-PALCHAZACA and DAYANA SARI-GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Gomez et al v. Cleaning Caleb Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv06703
Plaintiff:
Maria Gomez and Carlos Quizhpe
Defendant:
Cleaning Caleb Corp., Richard James Blum and Carolina Ortega
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Tejada Gonzalez v. Rosas Tamales, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03580
Plaintiff:
Griselda Tejada Gonzalez
Defendant:
Rosas Tamales, Inc. and Rosa Maria Gomez Ponce
Gjoni et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04465
Plaintiff:
Laureta Gjoni, Lucelaines Calderon, Yoneiby Lorenzo and others
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., X Corp. and Nexgen Facilities Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Holcombe et al v. Independent Living Systems, LLC.
as 1:2023cv21131
Plaintiff:
William Holcombe and Maria Gomez
Defendant:
Independent Living Systems, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SALGADO et al v. LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv23460
Plaintiff:
NESTOR F. SALGADO and MARIA GOMEZ
Defendant:
LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
