Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Hampton et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
Mary Hampton and David Hampton
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pro-Life Mississippi, et al v. Lindsay Horton, et al
as 14-60839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRO-LIFE MISSISSIPPI, DANA CHISHOLM, ESTER MANN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDSAY HORTON, Individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police for the City of Jackson, Mississippi, JESSE ROBINSON, Individually and in his official capacity as an Officer for the City of Jackson, Mississippi Police Department, JAMES MCGOWAN, Individually and in his official capacity as an Officer for the City of Jackson, Mississippi Police Department and others
Pro-Life Mississippi et al v. Horton et al
as 3:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
Pro-Life Mississippi , Dana Chisholm , Ester Mann and others
Defendant:
Lindsay Horton , Jesse Robinson , James McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN REMANDED.
as 7:2013cv00321
Plaintiff:
Colleen Gittins
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company , Fourseventy Claims, LLC , Reuben Quintero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Allen et al v. The City of Jackson, Mississippi et al
as 3:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Willie Allen , Adrian Craft , Amanda Daniels and others
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Mississippi and Police Department of the City of Jackson, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hampton v. Encore Capital Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mary Hampton
Defendant:
Encore Capital Group, Inc. , Midland Funding, LLC , Midland Credit Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hampton v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2009cv00058
Plaintiff:
Mary Hampton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
