Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ruether et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2026cv13612
Defendant:
Flexi Leasing Van, Inc., Dassler Domestic Logistics, Inc. and Hector Gonzalez Castro
Plaintiff:
Claudine Nanette Bormet and Mark Robert Ruether
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Henry v. Roberts
as 26-40588
Plaintiff:
Billy Henry
Defendant:
Mark Roberts, Beth Pipkins, Matt Gross and others
Roberts v. Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC
as 2:2026cv01526
Plaintiff:
Mark Roberts
Defendant:
Absolute Resolutions Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Roberts v. LTL LED, LLC
as 0:2026cv03525
Plaintiff:
Mark Roberts
Defendant:
LTL LED, LLC doing business as Wolf River Electric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Tezak-ESERVICE v. Lacasse, et al.
as 26-4094
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MARTIN TEZAK-ESERVICE
Defendant:
LEONARD JOSPEH LACASSE, MARK ROBERT NAREAU, DOUGLAS MARSHALL PROUTY and others
Stembridge v. Smith
as 2:2026cv00589
Plaintiff:
James B Stembridge
Defendant:
Mark Robert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MANOVILL et al v. HNE INC. et al
as 3:2026cv02030
Plaintiff:
MRS. DONYA MANOVILL and MR. ALBERT TIMOTHY MANOVILL, JR.
Defendant:
HNE INC., SERVEPRO and MARK ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv02606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PS) Tezak v. Lacasse et al
as 2:2025cv03442
Defendant:
Leonard Jospeh Lacasse, Mark Robert Nareau, Douglas Marshall Prouty and others
Plaintiff:
William Martin Tezak-ESERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bluemel v. Image Comics, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv02708
Plaintiff:
Mark-Robert Bluemel
Defendant:
Image Comics, Inc., Brian Posehn, Rick Remender and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
