Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Smith et al v. State Auto Insurance et al
as 2:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Martha Lynne Smith and Kevin Andre Claughton-Smith
Defendant:
State Auto Insurance and Amica Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Despina Lucas v. Shawn Pfarner
as 20-1863
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, CITY/ COUNTY OF HAMPTON, Virginia, CITY OF MORRIS, ILLINOIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DESPINA NEUPH LUCAS
Lucas v. Pfarner et al
as 2:2019cv00503
Defendant:
Performance Food Group, County of Craven, North Carolina & District 3B, City of Morris, Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
Despina N.A. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scott v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as LAE/2:17-cv-08780
Plaintiff:
Martha Lynn Scott
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Scott v. Sanofi S.A. et al
as 2:2017cv08780
Plaintiff:
Martha Lynn Scott
Defendant:
Sanofi S.A., Aventis Pharma S.A., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pound v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13035
Plaintiff:
Martha Lynn Pound
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guy v. Municipality of Hoover, AL et al
as 2:2014cv01092
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Municipality of Hoover, AL, Nick Joseph, Andy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guy v. Hoover, AL, Municipality of et al
as 2:2014cv00744
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jon Guy
Defendant:
Hoover, AL, Municipality of, Martha Lynn, Bates and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
