Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Vigil v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00639
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Martin Henry Vigil
Maier et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2011cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Maier , Hannah Maier , Nat-Mo Maier Inc and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc , Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maier et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 3:2010cv00290
Plaintiff:
Michael Maier , Hannah Maier , Nat-Mo Maier Inc and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Bayer Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Martin Vigil
as 10-56179
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN HENRY VIGIL
Martin Henry Vigil v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv07474
Petitioner:
Martin Henry Vigil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
BILAL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2009cv03811
Plaintiff:
ROCHELLE BILAL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SYLVESTER JOHNSON, JOHN J. GAITTEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00244
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Harold Martin Henry v. E.D. Bullard Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-61710
Defendant:
E.D. Bullard Co
Plaintiff:
Harold Martin Henry
HENRY v. E.D. BULLARD et al
as 2:2008cv61710
Plaintiff:
HAROLD MARTIN HENRY, HAROLD MARTIN HENRY, HAROLD MARTIN HENRY and others
Defendant:
E.D. BULLARD, ATLAS TURNER, INC., ATLAS TURNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01953
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
