Cases 11 - 20 of 96
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05291
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv79334
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2020cv01542
Petitioner:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
DIRECTOR RICK JACOBS, VICE CHAIRMAN BRIAN OWENS, CENTRAL STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv01376
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH and PAUL WILLIAMSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00977
Plaintiff:
Marvin Smith and Paul Williamson
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hunter et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00962
Plaintiff:
Paula Wheeler, John Purcell, Clarence M. Titlow and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch LLC, VM Motori S.p.A., Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SMITH v. NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv00646
Plaintiff:
MARVIN SMITH
Defendant:
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hunter et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 2:2019cv10345
Plaintiff:
Paula Wheeler, John Purcell, Clarence M. Titlow and others
Defendant:
Robert Bosch, LLC, VM Motori S.p.A., Robert Bosch GmbH and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2018cv03293
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MARVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
