Cases
Schultz v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv02196
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Plaintiff: Marie Celeste Schultz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 id
Schultz v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2014cv03269
Plaintiff: Mary E Schultz and Joseph A Schultz
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc , Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schultz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26841
Plaintiff: Mary A. Schultz
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schultz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as MN/0:14-cv-03956
Plaintiff: Mary A Schultz
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Schultz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv03956
Plaintiff: Mary A Schultz
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rames-Schultz v. Scientific Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2010hc60144
Plaintiff: Mary Rames-Schultz
Defendant: Changzhou SPL Company Ltd, Covidien, Inc., American Capital Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Androme Leather Corporation v. City of Gloversville
as 10-515
Plaintiff - Appellant: Androme Leather Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: City of Gloversville, Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Gloverville, D. Robert Robbins and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00463
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Jayhawk Cafe, LLC et al v. Colorado Springs Liquor and Beer Licensing Board et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01898
Plaintiff: Jayhawk Cafe, LLC and Hui Yon Park
Defendant: Colorado Springs Liquor and Beer Licensing Board, Colorado Springs, City of, Lee (I) McCrae and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?