Cases 21 - 30 of 98
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2019cv01125
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Laurie Marie King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
King et al v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00670
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc., Bank of the Ozarks, Ford Motor Company and others
Plaintiff:
Kolby King and Mary King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Tuscola Area Airport Authority, et al v. Daniel Elwell
as 19-1153
Petitioner:
Almer Charter Township, Michigan, Eric King, Dale Heinlein and others
Respondent:
Daniel K. Elwell
King v. Carnival Cruise Lines
as 1:2019cv22251
Plaintiff:
Mary King
Defendant:
Carnival Cruise Lines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Inova Health Care Services
as 1:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Inova Health Care Services
Plaintiff:
Anne-Marie King
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
King v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv12585
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Sandoz, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mary King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DeCotis-Thomas v. Town of North Kingstown et al
as 1:2018cv00602
Plaintiff:
Cheryl DeCotis-Thomas
Defendant:
Phillip Auger, Mary King, Donna Sweet and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
DeCotis-Thomas v. Town of North Smithfield et al
as 1:2018cv00601
Defendant:
Town of North Smithfield, Phillip Auger, Mary King and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl DeCotis-Thomas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Entertainment One UK Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv04928
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Glooke Marketplace, 8_bitgame_com and others
Plaintiff:
Entertainment One UK Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
