Cases 21 - 30 of 34
Davis v. McCool, et al
as 6:2012cv00394
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Valasta Davis
Defendant:
Gary McCool , Tony Taylor , Kim Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McFadden v. Westley et al
as 3:2012cv02392
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden
Defendant:
Mr Westley, Officer of Kirkland's Law Library, Margaret Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeFreitas v. Mongomery County Correctional, et al
as 12-3305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENN A. DEFREITAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE INC, NIKKI HOLLER, RN IN HER OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY and others
Mary Williams v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-20607
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARY WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Williams v. Thaler
as 4:2011cv00635
Petitioner:
Mary Williams
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Farrer v. Little et al
as 1:2010cv01033
Plaintiff:
Charles Farrer
Defendant:
George M. Little, Tony Parker, John E. Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02846
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Roger Ewing v. Valley Food, et al
as 09-60696
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROGER CRAIG EWING
Defendant - Appellee:
VALLEY FOOD, MARY WILLIAMS, Kitchen Supervisor, Unit 29, BURKE, Unit 42 Medical Director and others
Ewing v. Valley Food et al
as 4:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
Roger Craig Ewing
Defendant:
Valley Food, Mary Williams, Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marche Reddick v. State of Oregon, et al
as 09-35021
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCHE T. REDDICK
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON, MARY WILLIAMS and ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
