Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Massingil v. United States of America
as 4:2026cv05881
Plaintiff:
Leslie Massingil
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERCIA
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Cosgray v. Ortega et al
as 1:2026cv01890
Petitioner:
David W. Cosgray
Respondent:
FNU Ortega, FNU Chavez and Billy Massingill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Massingill v. Warden Smith
as 4:2026cv04602
Plaintiff:
Edward Earl Massingill
Defendant:
Warden Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massingill v. Angiodynamics, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03711
Plaintiff:
Matthew Massingill
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc. and Navilyst Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
MARA Holdings, Inc. et al v. Hood County, Texas et al
as 4:2025cv01202
Plaintiff:
MARA Holdings, Inc. and Does 1-8 4:25-cv-1202-O
Defendant:
Hood County, Texas, County Judge Ron Massingill, County Attorney Matt Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Deandre Gordon v. Nurse Practitioner Jessee
as 25-6892
Plaintiff:
DEANDRE JAQUAN GORDON
Defendant:
NURSE PRACTITIONER JESSEE, C/O STUMPF, C/O SEXTON and others
Jane Doe 1 et al v. Parol et al
as 1:2025cv00237
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
Sean Parol, Teresa Massingill and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Claiborne v. Dotson et al
as 7:2025cv00384
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Claiborne
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson, Thomas A. Meyers, David E. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MASSINGILL v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2025cv03213
Unknown:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ILLISCA MASSINGILL
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., KENVUE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
