Cases 51 - 60 of 240
Mathis v. Hague et al
as 1:2019cv01643
Defendant:
Maksed Choudry, Corizon Health Maryland, Mary Ellen and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Scott Marshall v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC
as 19-1437
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SCOTT MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee:
KENT MATHY and AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES, LLC
Lowrance et al v. Kernell et al
as 9:2019cv01108
Defendant:
Joselin Elmore, Brian Comeau, Pandoria Rector and others
Plaintiff:
David W. Lowrance and Margaret B. Lowrance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00180
Defendant:
Terra Renewal Services, Inc. and Darling Ingredients, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gordon Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roland Mathis v. Dr. Irene Wasylyk
as 19-6368
Defendant / Appellee:
ARH APPALACHIAN REGIONAL HEALTH CARE HOSPITAL, GARLAND R. WARD, PA-C and DR. IRENE WASYLYK
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROLAND MATHIS
Mathis v. Shew
as 5:2019cv00009
Respondent:
Wilkes County Sheriff Chris Shew
Petitioner:
Albert Uriah Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morganherring v. Mathis
as 5:2018ct03358
Plaintiff:
William Morganherring
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Civitarese et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2018cv03434
Plaintiff:
Melissa Goss, Leslie Mathis, Clayton Hendricks and others
Defendant:
Kidde PLC, Inc., The 3M Company, National Foam Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MATHIS v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2018cv01019
Petitioner:
QUENTIN ODELL MATHIS
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mathis v. Wasylyk et al
as 5:2018cv01487
Defendant:
Dr. Irene Wasylyk, M.D., Garland R. Ward, PA-C and ARH Appalachian Regional Health Care Hospital
Plaintiff:
Roland Mathis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
