Cases 1 - 10 of 240
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. SSA
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Matthew A Smith
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Bruno v. Beard et al
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bruno
Defendant:
Gregory A. Beard, William B. Spence, Ricardo R.A. Larroude and others
Smith, et al. v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-70
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW JAMES SMITH, PAUL CALLEN, KATHY POWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Smith v. Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.) et al
as 3:2023cv50402
Plaintiff:
Matthew Michael Smith
Defendant:
Thomson United States Penitentiary(F.B.O.P.), Warden Gonzalis, G.E.O. Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
