Cases 101 - 110 of 470
Farass Ali v. Joel Brott
as 19-1244
Respondent:
Kirstjen Nielsen, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, Ronald Vitiello, Acting Director, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew G. Whitaker, Attorney General and others
Undetermined:
Farass Ali and Joel L. Brott, Sheriff, Sherburne County
Cordova-Garcia v. Barr
as 19-217
Petitioner:
Veda Raquel Cordova-Garcia, Edin Orlando Gonzalez-Garcia, Keilin Raquel Cordova and others
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00341
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00079
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Douglas v. Barr
as 19-192
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Leonardo Christopher Douglas, AKA Leonardo Douglas
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
ATLAS BREW WORK, LLC v. WHITAKER
as 1:2019cv00079
Plaintiff:
ATLAS BREW WORK, LLC
Defendant:
MATTHEW G. WHITAKER and WILLIAM BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Fremont v. Barr
as 19-369
Petitioner:
Gary Fremont
Respondent:
Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting United States Attorney General and William P. Barr, Acting United States Attorney General
Munoz v. Sessions et al
as 3:2019cv00084
Respondent:
Jeff Sessions, Scotty Rhoden, John Kelly and others
Petitioner:
Francisco Rodriguez Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
