Cases 11 - 18 of 18
KNIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27161
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ashford et al v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2013cv00771
Lead Plaintiff:
James Ashford
Plaintiff:
Keon Canada, Charles Smith, Brandon Graham and others
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Edward A Flynn, Edith Hudson and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
D J B, B G C, S F F and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Rebecca L Pixley, Terrence T Gordon, Regina Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 13-7022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
Cathey v. Jones, et al
as 12-7031
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BILL ROBERT CATHEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director of DOC, DEBBIE MORTON, Director's Designee, RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden OSP and others
Bradley et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 4:2010cv01848
Plaintiff:
Tony Bradley , Ray E Vester , GC Farms Partnership and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP , Bayer CropScience Holding Inc , Bayer Cropscience LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley et al v. Bayer CropScience LP et al
as 3:2010cv00171
Plaintiff:
Tony Bradley , Ray E Vester , GC Farms Partnership and others
Defendant:
Bayer CropScience LP, Bayer CropScience Holding Inc, Bayer CropScience LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARLOW v. KNIGHT et al
as 3:2008cv00089
Plaintiff:
GREGORY L. HARLOW
Defendant:
MATTHEW KNIGHT, UNKNOWN SUPERVISORS and THE CITY OF EVANSVILLE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KNIGHT v. USA
as 5:2007cv00014
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
KEVIN MATTHEW KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
