Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Timothy v. Falls City PD et al
as 8:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
Matthew Timothy
Defendant:
Falls City PD, Juan Ramirez and Michael L. Dougherty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCDONALD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv70409
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TIMOTHY MCDONALD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Matthew Timothy Huffman v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2020cv00731
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Matthew Timothy Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Clevenger et al
as 4:2019cv00574
Defendant:
Estate of Margaret Clevenger, Matthew Timothy Clevenger, Timothy Clevenger and others
Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
New York Life Insurance Company v. Clevenger et al
as 4:2019cv00386
Plaintiff:
New York Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Estate of Margaret Clevenger, Matthew Timothy Clevenger, Timothy Clevenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norris v. Gilmore Superintendent SCI-Greene et al
as 1:2018cv02264
Petitioner:
Matthew Timothy Norris
Respondent:
Gilmore Superintendent SCI-Greene and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANDERS v. BECK
as 1:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GARY SANDERS
Defendant:
WILLIAM BECK, CLAIRE M NOBLE, LYNN E SHIPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Timothy Alexander v. Warden
as 3:2016cv02685
Petitioner:
Matthew Timothy Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthew Timothy Alexander v. Warden
as 2:2016cv02874
Petitioner:
Matthew Timothy Alexander
Respondent:
Warden
Matthew McCullough v. Nancy Rouse
as 10-6716
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW TIMOTHY MCCULLOUGH
Respondent - Appellee:
NANCY ROUSE, Warden, ROBERT GANSLER, Esquire and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
