Cases 1 - 10 of 257
Ackerman et al v. Arkema Inc.
as 4:2024cv01588
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Ackerman, Mary Ackerman, Sylbestre Aburto and others
Defendant:
Arkema Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Alexander et al v. Sutton et al
as 1:2024cv02224
Plaintiff:
Deborah Alexander, Maud Maron and Noah Harlan
Defendant:
Tajh Sutton, Marissa Manzanares, David C. Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAWYER-HEATLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10325
Plaintiff:
MAUDE FRANCES SAWYER-HEATLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maud Borup, Inc. v. Delica Foods North America, Ltd. et al
as 0:2023cv02647
Plaintiff:
Maud Borup, Inc.
Defendant:
Delica Foods North America, Ltd. and Sweetworks Confections, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HARTLEY et al v. USA
as 1:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. HARTLEY and MAUD ELLA LINDSLEY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Laroche-St. Fleur
as 23-8024
Respondent:
MAUDE LAROCHE-ST. FLEUR
Interested Party:
MASSACHUSETTS SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT and MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS
Buchser v. Warner et al
as 1:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Susan Maude Buchser and Susan BUCHSER-LOCHOCKI for Congress
Defendant:
Mac Warner and Election Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lee et al v. AAA Freight Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv05652
Plaintiff:
Maud Lee, Arrick Jackson and Tremayne Williams
Defendant:
AAA Freight Inc. and Deki Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Allen v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv01505
Plaintiff:
Maud Allen
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Michael Fitzgerald, et al v. Maude Murray
as 22-2224
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD and WORLD WISDOM, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
MAUDE MURRAY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
