Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Moore v. Brown et al
as 5:2017cv00309
Plaintiff:
Quintin L Moore
Defendant:
Daryl Brown, Steven Mitchell, Christopher Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. McCrimmon et al
as 5:2017ct03205
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Barnett, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McCrimmon and Brent S. Soucier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards et al v. Century Roofing and Sheet Metal, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv06117
Plaintiff:
Joseph Richards , Durable Roofing Company and Richards Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Century Roofing and Sheet Metal, LLC, Calvin McCrimmon and Joannie McCrimmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Playa Villas LLC v. Linear Wave LLC et al
as 2:2017cv05102
Defendant:
DOES, Kimberly Fowler, Linear Wave LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Playa Villas LLC
Lewis v. Chisom et al
as 5:2017cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jermain D Lewis
Defendant:
Carolyn Chisom, Connie Hubbard, Stanley Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrimmon v. Thomas et al
as 2:2017cv12108
Plaintiff:
Amy Sue McCrimmon
Defendant:
J. Thomas, A. Thomas, T. Allen and others
Worley et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04337
Plaintiff:
Sandra Reid, Dorsey Futrell, Gale Richardson and others
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City Police Department
Receiver:
Quillermo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Playa Villas LLC v. Linear Wave, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv04177
Defendant:
Does, Linear Wave, LLC and Harold McCrimmon
Plaintiff:
Playa Villas LLC
MCCRIMMON v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv02148
Plaintiff:
PENNY MCCRIMMON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
