Cases 1 - 10 of 161
McGary et al v. Inslee et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mr Darnell McGary and Ms Elizabeth McGary
Defendant:
Mr Jay Inslee, Susan Dryfus, Bob Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woodford v. Monroe County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv10313
Plaintiff:
Darryl Dominic Woodford
Defendant:
Monroe County Jail, Davis, McGary and others
McGary v. Inslee, et al.
as 23-3485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL MCGARY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, GOVERNOR, Govenor, State of Washington, LUJAN GRISHAM, Govenor, State of New Mexico, MANUEL GONZALAZ, Sheriff, New Mexico and others
MCGARY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv03262
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MCGARY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ABELON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 9:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
JOHN ABELON, JOHN MARK ALLEN, FRANK BEAMON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McGary v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05984
Plaintiff:
Teresa McGary
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abelon et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hawkins, Jeffrey Herrington, Renita Jackson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Darnell McGary v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 23-35552
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARNELL OTIS MCGARY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, Govenor, State of Washington, LUJAN GRISHAM, Govenor, State of New Mexico, MANUEL GONZALAZ, Sheriff, New Mexico and others
Ball v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv03245
Plaintiff:
Roslind Ball
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Rob Jeffreys, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
