Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 65
McGown v. Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02471
Petitioner: Paul Kevin McGown
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGown v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02148
Petitioner: Paul Kevin McGown
Respondent: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McGown v. United States of America
as 4:2016cv03241
Petitioner: Curtis McGown
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McGown v. USA
as 4:2015cv00176
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Curtis McGown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
LZG Realty LLC v. McGown et al
as 1:2015cv06372
Defendant: 555 I Owners Corp., JOHN DOE #1-5, Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company and others
Debtor-in-Posse: Brooklyn Renaissance, LLC
Plaintiff: LZG Realty LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452 R&R re motions to remand (non-core)
Seif v. Wendy et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00034
Plaintiff: Jonathan Seif
Defendant: Kelly Wendy, David White, Eddie Selvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGown v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv29887
Plaintiff: Lana McGown
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGown et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv27353
Plaintiff: Michelle McGown and Mike McGowan
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mcgown v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv09718
Plaintiff: Constance Mcgown
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hargroves et al v. Country Visions, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00080
Plaintiff: Curtis Hargroves , Cristi Hargroves and Kevin McGown
Defendant: Country Visions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?