Cases 41 - 50 of 154
McFadden v. McKay et al
as 2:2017cv00252
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden
Defendant:
John McKay, Jane or John Doe, Mellisa Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORTESE, ET AL. V. NATIONAL VAN LINES, INC., ET AL
as 1:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE CORTESE and ELENA M. MCKAY
Defendant:
NATIONAL VAN LINES, INC. and VANLINER INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Interstate Freight Claim (Carmack Amendment)
McKay v. Medical University of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2017cv00045
Defendant:
Medical University of South Carolina, The, Megan Shiverdecker and Christine Cooley
Plaintiff:
McKay and Kathleen McKay
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Overland-McKay v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv11733
Plaintiff:
Peggy Overland-McKay
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKay v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv11013
Plaintiff:
Judy D. McKay
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv03621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKay v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10302
Plaintiff:
Stephanie McKay
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company v. English et al
as 4:2016cv03404
Plaintiff:
Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Denise L English and Lori D McKay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McKay v. Clarke
as 3:2016cv00831
Petitioner:
Alonzo Alexander McKay
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McKay et al v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv08322
Plaintiff:
Luz D. McKay and Jerome Gregory McKay
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated , Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
