Cases 31 - 40 of 70
McRoy v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2017cv03071
Plaintiff:
William McRoy
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McRoy v. Berryhill
as 6:2017cv03373
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Eva McRoy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
USA v. McRoy et al
as 2:2017mj00022
Defendant:
Tamris C McRoy , Nina M Reyes and Ryan J Thomas
Plaintiff:
USA
Marko McRoy v. J. Clark Kelso et al
as 3:2017cv01423
Plaintiff:
Marko McRoy
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Shawn Hatton, S. Camara and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP, et al v. THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, et al
as 1:2016cv01274
Defendant:
THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS , A. GRANT WHITNEY, JR. , RHONDA K. AMOROSO and others
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF THE NAACP , MOORE COUNTY BRANCH OF THE NAACP , JAMES EDWARD ARTHUR, SR. and others
Interested_party:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McRoy v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
Billie Joe McRoy
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Dan Clark and Terry Mapes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Diversicare Leasing Corp et al
as 1:2014cv02990
Plaintiff:
Allison Adams , Katherine Anderson , Ladawn Bailey and others
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp , Diversicare Management Services Co. , Advocat, Inc. n/k/a Diversicare Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Adams et al v. Diversicare Leasing Corp et al
as 2:2014cv02990
Plaintiff:
Allison Adams , Katherine Anderson , Ladawn Bailey and others
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp, Diversicare Management Services Co., Advocat, Inc. n/k/a Diversicare Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
