Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02860
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant: UNITED STATES
Defendant: MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party: GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Kelemen v. Hamlin, et al.
as 24-1906
Plaintiff: JASON JOSEPH KELEMEN
Defendant: JOHN HAMLIN, WILLIAM MARSHALL, EVELYN CANTENO and others
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party: GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
MCMANUS v. LLT MANAGEMENT INC et al
as 3:2024cv02028
Defendant: LLT MANAGEMENT INC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff: DANIELLE L MCMANUS
Not Yet Classified: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rankin v. McManus
as 5:2024hc02051
Petitioner: Shurod Rankin
Respondent: Shawn McManus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Globokar v. Hess Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv01723
Plaintiff: William Globokar
Defendant: Hess Corporation, James H. Quigley, Terrence J. Checki and others
Ometu v. City of San Antonio
as 24-50152
Plaintiff: Mathias Ometu
Defendant: City of San Antonio, William McManus, Chief of Police, Devin Day, Officer, Badge # 0490 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00132
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?