Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Douglas Jones, et al v. Kimberley Jacobs, et al
as 23-3797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SERGEANT DOUGLAS JONES, Columbus Division of Police, OFFICER RANDALL LYONS, Columbus Division of Police and OFFICER ANTHONY JOHNSON, Columbus Division of Police
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLEY JACOBS, Columbus Division of Police, DEPUTY CHIEF MICHAEL WOODS, Columbus Division of Police, COMMANDER MARK LANG, Columbus Division of Police and others
Defendant:
OFFICER(S) JOHN DOE, Columbus Division of Police and OFFICER(S) JANE DOE, Columbus Division of Police
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Meaders v. Gaari et al
as 5:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Angela Meaders
Defendant:
Mac Trucking, LLC, Great West Casualty Co, Abdisamad Gaari and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MEADERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv03687
Plaintiff:
SHELBY MEADERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Livingston v. Warner et al
as 2:2022cv01510
Plaintiff:
Steven Ariel Livingston and Steve Livingston
Defendant:
Warner, Miller, Dejon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEADER v. USA
as 1:2022cv00224
Petitioner:
KENNETH LEON MEADER
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Susan Vaughan v. Kathlyn Romm
as 22-1727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUSAN W. VAUGHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHLYN S. ROMM, an individual, RAY MATUSKO, an individual, COURTNEY HULL, an individual and others
Kindred v. Lumpkin
as 22-40347
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Herman Lee Kindred
Defendant / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Pennie Kempt, Assistant Warden, Michael Unit, Eric K. White and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
