Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03624
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Copeland v. Lynch et al
as 1:2026cv01395
Plaintiff:
Darrel L. Copeland
Defendant:
Kevin Lynch, Unknown Jones, Unknown Glenndenning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaster v. Jackson et al.
as 1:2026cv02777
Plaintiff:
Michael David Plaster
Defendant:
Denise Renee Jackson, Jodie Schumacher, Martin Newman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITLEY v. MEARS et al
as 1:2026cv02167
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL M. WHITLEY
Defendant:
RYAN MEARS and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Mears v. VCCW Medical Department
as 2:2026cv01029
Plaintiff:
Emily Dawn Mears
Defendant:
VCCW Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mears v. VCCW Medical Department
as 7:2026cv00756
Plaintiff:
Emily Dawn Mears
Defendant:
VCCW Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mears v. Supplying Demand, Inc.
as 8:2026cv02674
Plaintiff:
Keri Mears
Defendant:
Supplying Demand, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Deceptive Trade Practices
Mears v. Rutherford County State of Tennessee
as 3:2026cv01255
Plaintiff:
James Patrick Mears
Defendant:
Rutherford County State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. BRYANT et al
as 5:2026cv00215
Petitioner:
SHIRLEY MEARS DAVIS
Respondent:
MICHAEL A BRYANT, TIMOTHY C CAMPBELL, CHRISTOPHER N PATTERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ferguson v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2026cv00326
Plaintiff:
Kenneth S Ferguson
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Scott Hunt and Ryan Mears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
