Cases 71 - 80 of 198
Medina v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 0:2017cv02398
Plaintiff:
Daisy Figueroa Medina
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hellerstein v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03345
Plaintiff:
Betty Masch, Connie Hofer, Hilda Lopez and others
Defendant:
Astora Women's Health, Inc., Boston Scientific Corporation, Doe Manufacturers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Medina v. USA
as 1:2017cv00127
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Zuniga Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Samuel Medina
as 17-4272
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMUEL ZUNIGA MEDINA, a/k/a Ghost
Medina v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2017cv02015
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Medina
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Paula Leonard v. Sarah Starkey
as 17-1231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAULA L. LEONARD and ROBERT P. LEONARD
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH STARKEY, BRENDA WARE, TERRY WALKER and others
Defendant:
JULIE GARVIN and WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES
Haltiwanger v. De Luna Medina et al
as 5:2017cv00359
Plaintiff:
Carlton Haltiwanger
Defendant:
Rogelio De Luna Medina and Extreme Pool Plastering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones et al v. Enziime, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00125
Plaintiff:
Garry Jones , Suzanna Krebs , Barbara Coyne and others
Defendant:
Enziime, LLC , Vitalspring Technologies, Inc. , Yona Health Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Medina-Mar v. Warden Saad
as 5:2017cv00007
Petitioner:
Felipe Medina-Mar
Respondent:
Warden Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Veloz v. Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority et al
as 8:2016cv04073
Plaintiff:
Samuel Medina Veloz
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority and Robert B. Turkson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
