Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Escamilla v. Judge Medrano
as 3:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Melenudo Escamilla
Respondent:
Judge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elvis Medrano v. Brandon Garland, et al
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
ELVIS C. MEDRANO
Defendant:
BRANDON GARLAND, KANE WAGGONER, GREG DIETCH and others
ORTIZ v. PINCKNEY et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO MEDRANO ORTIZ
Defendant:
SHATEEMA PINCKNEY, TAMEKA SMITH, REGINA HAMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant, Jarrod v. Thompson, Breanna et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Nicholas Gant
Defendant:
Breanna Thompson, Shy Medrano, Sgt. Kraemer and others
Not Yet Classified:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams #200957 v. Medrano et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lamont M Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Medrano, Unknown Freetag, B Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valenzuela v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02293
Petitioner:
Armando Medrano Valenzuela
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEDRANO v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv20303
Petitioner:
FERNANDO DUARTE MEDRANO
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Anthony James Medrano v. Kevin Hixton
as 2:2023cv06431
Petitioner:
Anthony James Medrano
Respondent:
Acting Warden Kevin Hixton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medrano v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Lucas Marie Medrano
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
