Cases 21 - 30 of 1,091
Adams #200957 v. Medrano et al
as 2:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Lamont M Adams
Defendant:
Unknown Medrano, Unknown Freetag, B Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16939
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Villarreal v. Medrano Perez
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Arturo Villarreal
Defendant:
Rocio Medrano Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Medrano Salas et al v. Ron's Organics Inc
as 3:2023cv02563
Plaintiff:
GUILLERMO MEDRANO SALAS and IVAN NERI SAAVEDRA
Defendant:
RON'S ORGANICS, INC. and Ron's Organics Inc
RENDON et al v. BABBAR et al
as 3:2023cv22428
Plaintiff:
FELIPE D RENDON and VANESSA MEDRANO-CORTEZ
Defendant:
SANDEEP BABBAR, J&J TRANSPORT, ABC COMPANY 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Valenzuela v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv02293
Petitioner:
Armando Medrano Valenzuela
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medrano v. Coates et al
as 5:2023cv01533
Plaintiff:
Carlos J Medrano
Defendant:
Compass United Carrier, LLC, Lebaron Coates and Compass United Carrier L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Zelaya-Medrano v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 2:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Lurvin Zelaya-Medrano
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
