Cases 1 - 10 of 100
BLUE v. VOIGTSCHILD et al
as 2:2026cv00499
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
M. VOIGTSCHILD, K. FISCHER, J. PIRTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meeks v. Local & Federal Gov. et al
as 3:2026cv00978
Plaintiff:
Dario Andrean Meeks
Defendant:
Local & Federal Gov. and Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Babulal
as 26-1911
Defendant:
JOEL BABULAL, TAMEKA BABULAL, Joel Nical Babulal and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MEEK v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv04586
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE MEEK
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv00225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MITCHELL v. VOIGTSCHILD et al
as 2:2026cv00452
Plaintiff:
DARIEN DARRELL MITCHELL
Defendant:
VOIGTSCHILD, FISHER, J. MEEKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. City of Oakland, et al.
as 26-4128
Plaintiff:
LAJUANA A. REID
Defendant:
CITY OF OAKLAND, JOHN JACKO ROMERO, Serial No. 8927, Badge No. 902, JANEY LORRAINE MEEKS-HAY and others
Smith v. Blackwell et al
as 4:2026cv02548
Plaintiff:
Bartholomew Richard Smith, Jr., Bartholomew Smith, Bart and others
Defendant:
LT. Blackwell, Major Meeks, A.W. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rauch v. Robinson et al
as 5:2026cv06103
Plaintiff:
Michael Rauch
Defendant:
Abigail Robinson, Nikki Oaks, Michele Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Smith et al
as 4:2026cv02314
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Defendant:
John Smith, Felecia Meeks and Jessica Servert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
