Cases 31 - 40 of 50
London v. DiMotto et al
as 2:2015cv00429
Plaintiff:
Keith London
Defendant:
Jean DiMotto, David A Clarke , Edward Walls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menne v. Wright Medical Technology Incorporated et al
as 1:2014cv03786
Plaintiff:
William Allan Menne
Defendant:
Wright Medical Technology Incorporated and Wright Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Murphy v. Berdanier et al
as 1:2014cv00817
Plaintiff:
David N. Murphy
Defendant:
Gene Berdanier, Elana Galle, Prime Care Nursin Staff of Schuylkill County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roman Lovelace v. Rodney Menne, et al
as 14-1773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROMAN D. LOVELACE
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY G. MENNE, Captain, DAVIS R. ARNDT, Lieutenant, MATTHEW M. BABIASH, Correctional Officer and others
Hammond v. Soll et al
as 0:2014cv00344
Plaintiff:
Valerie Hammond
Defendant:
Donald J. Soll , Keith Krueger , Corizon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McAndrew et al v. Heartman et al
as 3:2013cv02256
Plaintiff:
Kristen McAndrew and Jocelyn McAndrew
Defendant:
Sherri Seiwell Heartman, Kelly Reinheimer Horning, Emily Teil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lovelace v. Menne et al
as 1:2013cv00933
Plaintiff:
Roman D Lovelace
Defendant:
Rodney G Menne , Davis R Arndt, Matthew M Babiash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menne v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2013cv00048
Plaintiff:
Dawn Menne
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01575
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
