Cases 51 - 60 of 97
Slavin et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv06615
Plaintiff:
Gary Slavin and Denise Horsford
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, MetLife, Inc., MetLife Securities, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ghorpade v. Metlife, Inc.
as 16-2867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shailendra Ghorpade
Defendant - Appellee:
Metlife, Inc. and MetLife Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher Townsend, Individually and Official Capacities
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jay Clogg Realty Group, Inc. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co
as 16-1604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY ADOFF, AGV SPORTS GROUP, INC., MICHAEL PARROTTE and others
Plaintiff:
JAY CLOGG REALTY GROUP, INC. and JAY CLOGG
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and METLIFE GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Swartz v. Metlife Group, Inc.
as 6:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Tracy Swartz
Defendant:
Metlife Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pickow v. Metlife Group, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02873
Defendant:
Metlife Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Pickow
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Pickow v. Metlife Group, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02873
Defendant:
Metlife Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kelly Pickow
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Frank Reed v. Citigroup Inc, et al
as 15-2094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK REED
Defendant - Appellee:
CITIGROUP INC, in care of Plan Administrator of Citigroup Inc., METLIFE GROUP INC, a New York Corporation and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO, a New York Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
