Cases 61 - 70 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lawrence v. The Dow Chemical Company et al
as 2:2014cv24223
Plaintiff:
Walter Daniel Lawrence
Defendant:
The Dow Chemical Company , MetLife Group, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv04379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Griffith v. Metlife Group Inc
as 3:2014cv02088
Plaintiff:
Ashely S Griffith
Defendant:
Metlife Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Barton v. Metlife Group, Inc.
as 8:2014cv01180
Plaintiff:
Keewanee Barton
Defendant:
Metlife Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barber vs. MetLife Insurance Company, et al
as 4:2013cv00583
Plaintiff:
Chance Aleczander Barber
Defendant:
MetLife Insurance Company , MetLife Group Inc., MetLife Affiliated Insurance Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SUMPTER v. DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS (HOLDING), INC. et al
as 1:2013cv00347
Defendant:
DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS (HOLDING), INC., DELPHI AUTOMOTIVE SYSTEMS LIFE & DISABILITY BENEFITS PROGRAM and METLIFE GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. SUMPTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
