Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ELIE v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 5:2026cv04681
Plaintiff:
JEAN BERNO ELIE
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, JOSEPH B. EDLOW, MARKWAYNE MULLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Metcalf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv05685
Plaintiff:
Katherine M Metcalf
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nietzche et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2026cv01248
Plaintiff:
William X. Nietzche, Julie Ann Metcalf Kinney and Estate of William Kinney Jr.
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Pemberton, Kristen Dennis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Thomas, Jr. v. Prine et al
as 1:2026cv03325
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Jr. James Prine, Margaret Chapura, Everlyn Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Metcalf v. Daz, et al.
as 26-3731
Plaintiff:
DENZELL MAGIC METCALF
Defendant:
DAZ, Correctional Officer and WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
