Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv03630
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03686
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gove v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2026cv00266
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Gove
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
TAYLOR v. CAUSEY et al
as 1:2026cv01290
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JOHN MICHAEL CAUSEY
Plaintiff:
APRIL ELAINE TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zander v. Ring, et al.
as 4:2026cv01629
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Zander
Defendant:
Leah Marie Perry and Lee Michael Ring
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sleva v. Brown County et al
as 1:2026cv02041
Defendant:
Justin A. Mueller and Brown County
Plaintiff:
Michael Sleva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Case v. County of Albany et al
as 7:2026cv09593
Defendant:
Ryan M Lawson, Anthony Coppolo, Michael Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas M Case
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Do v. Do et al
as 2:2026cv03623
Defendant:
Biovie, Inc., Michael Sherman, Sigmund Rogich and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Do
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Graham v. Haun et al.
as 5:2026cv02879
Defendant:
Deputy Michael Myers, Captain Timothy Stryker and Sheriff Richard Haun, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gevedon v. Traughber et al
as 1:2026cv01128
Defendant:
John Doe, Driver, Doordash, Inc., Betty Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Gevedon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
