Cases 1 - 10 of 100
US v. Andre Youngblood
as 26-4368
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANDRE YOUNGBLOOD, a/k/a Michael S. Long, a/k/a Michael Johnson
Johnson v. Adamek et al
as 2:2026cv12490
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Cynthia Adamek, Stacey Robinson, Michelle Powell and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lovejoy v. Johnson et al
as 0:2026cv03263
Plaintiff:
Sharon Lee Lovejoy and Tweety Bird Forbes
Defendant:
Andrew Johnson, Diane McCollum Johnson Forbes, Douglas Forbes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2026sf65119
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc. f/k/a MonoSol RX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Sadhwani
as 4:2026cv05233
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Raja Sadhwani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Ross et al v. Norada Capital Management LLC et al
as 8:2026cv01579
Plaintiff:
Matthew Ross and Shelley Ross
Defendant:
Norada Capital Management LLC, Norada Fund Management, LLC, Marco Santarelli and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Brodsky v. Reece et al
as 1:2026cv07203
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. Brodsky
Defendant:
Jim Reece, Eric Bowers, Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nettles v. Allen et al
as 1:2026cv02826
Plaintiff:
Kihiaviyan Mikkel Nettles
Defendant:
Sheriff Levon Allen, Chief Jonathan Green, Captain Michael Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Bullen (Johnson)
as 26-1163
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BULLEN, JIGAR DADARWALA, NARENDARAKUMA DADARWALA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Loki Operations, et al v. Textron Aviation, et al
as 26-3085
Plaintiff:
LOKI OPERATIONS, LLC, BOGDAN COCOSEL, ADAM HAFEZ and others
Defendant:
TEXTRON AVIATION, INC. and JOHN L. RYNEARSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
