Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Williams v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01272
Plaintiff:
Michael Williams
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
WILLIAMS, JR. v. PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2026cv06982
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ford v. Labanc et al
as 4:2026cv00374
Plaintiff:
Michael William Ford
Defendant:
Desire Labanc, Polk City Police Department, Polk County Jail and others
Interested Party:
Jeffrey Peterzalek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams v. Connectify Inc., et al
as 26-3190
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WILLIAMS, an individual domiciled in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Defendant:
CONNECTIFY INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION WITH ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS IN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, DBA SPEEDIFY and ALEXANDER C. GIZIS, AN INDIVIDUAL RESIDING IN PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA
John Anthony Williams v. M. Gentry
as 26-6919
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
M. GENTRY, Disciplinary Officer, S. SCEALF, Disciplinary Officer, SLED, J. COX, Disciplinary Officer; SLED investigator and others
John Anthony Williams v. Leslie Wakefield
as 26-6902
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NURSE LESLIE WAKEFIELD, HEAD NURSE SHANA PEELER, NURSE J. NEELY and others
John Anthony Williams v. Pilgram
as 26-6899
Plaintiff:
JOHN ANTHONY MICHAEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT PILGRAM and SERGEANT ATKENS
Wood v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2026cv03839
Plaintiff:
Michael William Wood
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
