Cases 1 - 10 of 21
DAVIDSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10233
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JAMES DAVIDSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davidson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00059
Petitioner:
Michael John Davidson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Michael Davidson
as 20-6343
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN DAVIDSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Houshang Momenian, et al v. Michael Davidson
as 20-7024
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vida Momenian, Houshang Momenian Revocable Trust, c/o HOUSHANG MOMENIAN, TRUSTEE, Houshang H. Momenian and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael M. Davidson
Davidson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00244
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Nancy S Davidson and Michael A Davidson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIDSON v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.
as 3:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. DAVIDSON
Defendant:
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Houshang Momenian, et al v. Michael Davidson
as 16-7129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Houshang H. Momenian, Vida Momenian and Houshang Momenian Revocable Trust, c/o HOUSHANG MOMENIAN, TRUSTEE
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael M. Davidson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armstrong v. Jones et al
as 5:2015cv00602
Plaintiff:
Arthur Orlandus Armstrong
Defendant:
B. K. Jones , J. E. Moore , W. L. Everett, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
MOMENIAN et al v. DAVIDSON
as 1:2015cv00828
Plaintiff:
HOUSHANG MOMENIAN and VIDA MOMENIAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL M. DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
