Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Michael Farley v. Anthony Wills
as 23-1191
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL P. FARLEY
Respondent / Appellee:
ANTHONY WILLS
Farley v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2022cv02177
Plaintiff:
Michael Dustin Farley
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Farley v. James Crabtree Correctional Center et al
as 5:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Farley
Defendant:
James Crabtree Correctional Center, Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farley v. Jones et al
as 5:2021cv01007
Plaintiff:
Michael Ross Farley
Defendant:
Mike Jones, C Mayfield and Felicia Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farley v. Wills
as 3:2021cv00756
Respondent:
Anthony Wills
Petitioner:
Michael P. Farley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trimarco v. Farley et al
as 1:2020cv01408
Defendant:
Shawn Patrick Carden, Ashish Kapoor, Michael A. Hilmer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael C. Trimarco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephan Marc Boedeker v. Michael R. Farley et al
as 8:2019cv02443
Plaintiff:
Stefan Marc Boedeker and Stefan Marc
Defendant:
Browseplay, Inc., Carl Venters, III, Michael R Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Boedeker v. Farley et al
as 8:2019cv02407
Defendant:
Browseplay, Inc., Carl Venters, III and Michael R Farley
Plaintiff:
Stephan Marc Boedeker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farley v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2018cv00722
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Farley
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Daniels v. State of West Virginia et al
as 1:2017cv00212
Plaintiff:
Perry Allen Daniels
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, West Virginia State Police, Monongalia County, West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
