Cases 1 - 10 of 487
Adams et al v. Gharib et al
as 1:2024cv09378
Plaintiff:
Michele Irene Arauz Castillo, James Adams, Claire Brynycz and others
Defendant:
Guillermo Gharib, Ashley Harris, Cyrus Abrahim and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
John Wayne v. John Wetzel, et al
as 24-2816
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, JAIME SORBER, LEE ESTOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN WAYNE
Vargas Bey v. County of San Bernardino, et al.
as 24-5547
Defendant:
ROSETTE-MONTEZ, JAY RUTHERFORD, JENNIFER ROSE PACINI and others
Plaintiff:
SULTANA AILENA VARGAS BEY
Clark #386257 v. Quellete et al
as 1:2024cv00823
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Margaret Quellete
Plaintiff:
Michael Clark #386257
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. BLAKE et al
as 2:2024cv01105
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK, Mr. Blake and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF INDIANA COUNTY
Petitioner:
TRAMALE LOCKETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DAVIS v. LITTLE et al
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
LAVEN T. DAVIS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, JANE/JOHN DOE, TABB BECKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ameris Bank v. Gym Supply Warehouse, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv01229
Defendant:
Gym Supply Warehouse, LLC an Ohio limited liability company doing business as American Manufacturing Solutions, Jason Michael Clark, Andrew T. Slone and others
Plaintiff:
Ameris Bank a Georgia statechartered banking corporation doing business as Balboa Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
United States v. Brian Clark
as 24-2493
Defendant:
Brian Michael Clark
Plaintiff:
United States of America
OLD v. USA
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CLARK OLD
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
