Cases 1 - 10 of 50
McGill v. Gotham Drywall Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01711
Plaintiff:
Ms. Patricia McGill
Defendant:
Gotham Drywall Inc., John Fitzpatrick, James Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Paula Love v. Michael Coyle et al
as 5:2023cv02555
Plaintiff:
Paula Love
Defendant:
Michael Coyle, Richard McGee, Patricia Scruggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-11898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
COYLE et al v. NORDIC TRACK, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv20277
Plaintiff:
LORI COYLE and MICHAEL COYLE
Defendant:
NORDIC TRACK, INC., HEALTH RIDER, INC., ICON HEALTH & FITNESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coyle v. New York City District Council
as 19-4101
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Coyle
Coyle v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03505
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Coyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coyle v. New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund
as 1:2019cv05000
Defendant:
New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund and NYC Carpenters Union Benefit Funds
Plaintiff:
Michael Coyle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Coyle et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2018dp20058
Plaintiff:
Michael Coyle and Kimberly Coyle
Defendant:
DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker et al v. Coyle Law Group, LLC et al
as 8:2015cv00682
Plaintiff:
Dexter O. Tucker and Kimberly Kaye Tucker
Defendant:
Coyle Law Group, LLC , Alon J. Nager and Michael Coyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
