Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Eddings v. Target Corporation
as 8:2022cv02060
Plaintiff:
Michael Eddings
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The Estate of Michael Eddings v. The Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00765
Plaintiff:
The Estate of Michael Eddings
Defendant:
The Alabama Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Christopher Gordy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv05089
Plaintiff:
Philip John Dixon , Teresa Drescher , Corey Larson and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as TXW/1:17-cv-00792
Plaintiff:
Philip John Dixon , Teresa Drescher , Angel Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Dixon et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Morgan Bowling, Michael Braden, Ricardo Bravo and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Erikson v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 17-6002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ED ERIKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA and WOODS COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
Erikson v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 16-6225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ED ERIKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA and WOODS COUNTY, OKLAHOMA
Erikson v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2016cv00657
Plaintiff:
Michael Ed Erikson
Defendant:
State of Oklahoma and Woods County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Ethredge et al
as 3:2016cv03071
Plaintiff:
James Young
Defendant:
David Ethredge, Jones and Michael Eddings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Ethredge et al
as 4:2016cv00313
Plaintiff:
James Young
Defendant:
David Ethredge, Jones and Michael Eddings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
