Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Wright v. Boeckman et al
as 3:2023cv00446
Plaintiff:
Blair Lanston Wright
Defendant:
Laura Boeckman, Fulvio Joseph Gentili, Robert R. Julian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WRIGHT v. MOODY et al
as 4:2023cv00134
Plaintiff:
BLAIR LANSTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
ASHLEY BROOKE MOODY, FULVIO JOSEPH GENTILI, ROBERT R JULIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Young v. City of Bloomington, Illinois, et al
as 23-1334
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT P. YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON, ILLINOIS, MCLEAN COUNTY STATE'S ATTORNEY and MICHAEL GRAY, Detective
Young v. City of Bloomington Illinois et al
as 1:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Robert P Young
Defendant:
City of Bloomington Illinois, States Attorney of McLean County and Michael Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Joshua Herridge v City of Galveston, Texas, et al
as 3:2018cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joshua Herridge
Defendant:
City of Galveston, Texas, Brian Maxwell and Michael Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00204
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00205
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wagda v. Town of Danville et al
as 3:2016cv00488
Plaintiff:
Donald Cloyce Wagda
Defendant:
Town of Danville, Town of Danville Police Department, County of Contra Costa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Gray et al
as 1:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Slate M. Gray
Defendant:
Michael Gray and Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
